If a receiver sight such as a Lyman 66 or Williams Foolproof is preferred, then points go to Marlin, who, at least until recently, has always drilled and tapped the side of their receivers for such sights. Remington’s Model 788 — Manufactured from 1967 to 1984, this bolt-action centerfire rifle was introduced as a budget alternative to the Model 700. MikeG Administrator. It would, however be a bit unfair to compare a 1920sMarlin to a 1970s Winchester, so we will confine this comparison to more modern versions of the Marlin, say, 1950s or later. The 6x42 was mounted on the Winchester Model 9422, the 4x32 was mounted on the Marlin 39AS with the aid of the base supplied by Marlin and the Simmons rings supplied by Raytrade. i second the motion, any 9422 (lr or mag) is aces in my book. I did, however, get the opportunity to hunt with a couple of them. I don’t dry fire the Winchesters just in case the same is true of them. Its thick tube of a receiver with a minimal ejection port was much stiffer than conventional receivers. Though I’m getting tired of saying it, several Carl Gustaf rifles passed through my hands without my keeping even one. 555.8K views. Marlin perfected a locking latch system in the ‘80s that works beautifully, positively locking the tube. I wouldn’t be surprised if it reappeared with anew tang safety, however. I’m sure most hunters can come up with at least a couple of discontinued guns they’d love to have a second chance at owning. The specific one is in excellent condition and has the factory box. Consider that the least expensive Model 700, the ADL, had a retail price of $134.95 in 1967, while the new 788 could be had for $84.95. The 1894 .22 Magnum model was short lived however, dying by the 1990s, and in some circles the rifle carries a premium because of its relative scarcity. Talk about missed opportunities! More recent 39s, I believe, have moved the serial number to accommodate those who wish to mount a tang peep. Leverguns I don’t have a Marlin with a scope on it, and I don’t have a Winchester in the .17 Hornady, and I don’t have a Marlin in the Trapper style, so, maybe six is just not enough? The material was stable enough to retain tight tolerances under all reasonable temperature extremes, had high-impact, structural and flexural strength, was impervious to solvents, acids and fungi, was self-lubricating and permanently held colors. The gun was originally offered in two stock colors:  Mohawk brown and Seneca green. A 20” barrel really makes more sense, since tests have long shown a .22 rimfire achieves its greatest velocity gain in only 16” of barrel, and actually loses velocity in a 24” barrel! The Winchester 9422M XTR is a rimfire.22 Magnum lever-action designed to mirror the look and feel of the iconic Model 94. I have a Henry 2012 Frontier 22 that is excellent for the price. Marlin’s trigger pull is crisp and sufficiently light for accuracy, the9422’s has a bit of creep that has never bothered me. Borrowed from its mother’s revered Model 61 pump action that was a victim of the infamous Winchester 1964 reorganization, the 9422’s action is velvety-smooth compared to the Marlin’s. Repeating Arms Co.  As its designation indicates, the action was designed by Husqvarna in Sweden, which prior to that was manufacturing a commercial Model `98 Mauser that was fully equal in quality to the FN Supreme actions made in Belgium for Browning. My reason for including it here as a gun worthy of acquiring is because it was so accurate, embarrassingly so for Remington. Bottom: Remington Model 788. 22 Magnum; 100% blue, excellent bore, excellent stock, 20'' barrel, Missouri Distributor Exclusive sequential serial number set, 9422 and 9422M, consignor notes state only 3 sets were manufactured. Hooded front sight. The latter are collectors’ items, but all the other models make superb working guns. You are here: Magazines > GunHunter > Articles. They are first run, made in 1972. Winchester 9422's Discussion and questions concerning Winchester Model 9422 lever actions. Performance Bullets | Merit . The white spacer at the buttplate definitely detracts, but is “period,” so I have left it there. When the 9422 was introduced, Winchester was trying to recover from its decision made almost a decade earlier to cheapen its guns, most notably the Model 70. | Friends of Billy Dixon For Sale: Old Winchester 9422 XTR CLASSIC .22 S/L/LR Rifle with Wood Stock Posted 01/11/2021 in FIREARMS by GOLD RUSH PAWN COMPANY Print The machining, the wood-to-metal fit, the lustrous blue and the effortless way the action cycled was on a quality level I never expected. Scanning the Internet forums dealing with recent 9422s, apparently mine is not an isolated case. Over its 33-year production span, it was offered in more than a dozen iterations ranging from a standard grade with walnut stock, WinCam and WinTuff laminates, Legacy, Trapper and XTR Classic versions, to 25th Anniversary editions and commemoratives. I'm trying to fix an old marines winchester 9422m that won't feed properly. • Stock Options: Got an inaccurate rifle? Continue with Facebook. The lever on the Marlin may require slightly more effort to work, as in prolonged quick-firing sessions with it I have noticed the outside of my right hand getting a bit sore----something that doesn’t happen with the 9422. Firearms | Rifles | 9422 . Quote. This article was first printed in the July 2011 edition of Buckmasters GunHunter Magazine. The 9422 lever-action rimfire rifle was first introduced by Winchester in 1972 and was produced for 32 years until 2004 in both .22 Long Rifle and .22 Magnum models. Earlier Marlins had no such hole; later ones also have another hole to check to see if the magazine has shells in it. That was pretty expensive for a .22 rimfire back then, but oh what a bargain it was! long-shanked screwdriver should the buttstock come loose, as one of mine did. Thus a ‘50s to late ‘80s would be the choice, if the non-safety model is preferred. Occasional versions (“Octagon” models and the39D in the 1970s, and the 1897 models in the 1990s,) were throwbacks to a rampless dovetailed bead front sight, but by and large, the hooded front ramp has been standard on all Marlins since at least the 50s. For scope mounting, though both accommodate this option, the kudos go to Winchester, I think, who grooved the top of their receiver for rimfire mounts. Since there was no receiver per se, the barrel simply sat in a V-block molded into the stock and held in place with a bracket. Unlike older Winchester lever actions it came grooved for scope mounting. forends. The barrel is the carbine-standard 20”, and has varied in weights and tapers from its introduction in the 1950s to its demise in the 1990s. I like both, depending on my mood when shooting. Brian Pearce in his Rifle article on the 9422 suggests using the One Ragged Hole rear sight, but I have not yet tried one, and it seems like it would actually obscure the sight picture. 22 WMR; 98% blue, Very good bore, Very good stock, 20'' barrel, Manufactured in 1976. Bullet Works | Gunblast.Com  | The Henry, Ruger, and Browning leverguns thus eliminated, we can move on to the only two candidates left. All doubts vanished when I saw this rifle for the first time. Winchester model 9422 for sale and auction. the fit, finish, and accuracy are the way all american made arms should strive for. One chambered in 7mm Rem Magnum I used to take my best mule deer to date. Buckmasters entertains and educates deer hunters with current strategies and technology from the most respected experts in the field. Continue with Google. Marlin’s “Micro-Groove” barrels came about in the 50s, and though much touted by Marlin, I can’t really tell the difference. Winchester’s 9422, introduced in the early 70s, duplicated the style of the Marlin at the same time it varied from it and challenged it. Chambered in 22 Magnum, the Winchester 9422M XTR makes a great varmint and small game hunting rifle. My advice, for what it’s worth, is if you want a Winchester, get a steel-tubed, non-checkered ‘70s edition. The rest is history. Marlin’s action is simplicity itself, with an easily removed, solid forged bolt providing a tight lockup, and a one-piece, drop-in firing pin that can be replaced in a second. Although it is more of a hassle to mount a scope on it, once it is done, the results are preferable to the Winchester, if one is going to keep the scope on it. buttstock/lever out of the receiver, and removing the bolt. Loosening one screw allows the barrel to be pulled free of the stock for easy cleaning from the breech end. Corporation, Marlin 39 vs. Winchester 9422 The “accuracy-robbing” barrel-band issue on the Winchester does not seem to affect rimfires as it does A simple turn of the screw pops the ejector back in place, the bolt is slid back into the left side of receiver, the two halves fitted together, the thumb screw tightened, and the gun is ready to go, a graceful miracle of 19th century technology! Winchester 9422M 22mag. Comparing the two actions, then, one has the simplicity and versatility of a true takedown in the Marlin versus the smoothness, but also complexity, of the Winchester. The half-cock safety on both is positive and catches with definition. Subscribe today to have GunHunter delivered to your home. The gun is a natural .22 Magnum, and is the same delight to carry in the field as the .22 Long Rifle version. Care must be taken when removing the bolt not to lose the little pin that is inserted crossways init-----it falls out easily. Ken Waters in his discussion of centerfire leveractions with hooded front sights has said more than once that they are to protect the sight in transit and then be removed for hunting, so that has usually been my practice. MODEL 9422 - Introduced in 1972 this model is chambered for the .22 rimfire and .22 Win. Again, that was for a brief time. Nothing even remotely similar to the Nylon 66 had ever been seen before or since. • America’s Most Popular OU: A very high-quality shotgun for the price, the Browning Citori holds up to extensive shooting. uncheckered, and later versions on both checkered. The category is exclusive because these are the only two rifles that meet my admittedly restrictive requirements; steel and walnut construction, no plastic or aluminum parts (butt plates excluded) and a “traditional” action in which the trigger does not move with the lever, and an outside hammer strikes the firing pin. Most of you know over the years I try to help people here with gunsmithing if I can, as a real smith is nonexistent. Their magazine tube is also held to the barrel with another “accuracy-robbing” barrel-band, while the Marlin’s is a dovetailed arrangement. I know the feeling; I wouldn’t either. My open sighted version came in handy one Sunday afternoon as I heard my free-ranging chickens squawking and looked out the window to see a coyote making off with a prized hen. Gray AmericanFlag Mesh CapFree Shipping$20.95. The 9422’s is nicely grooved, Marlin’s smooth. This is, I am sure, due to the fact that the scope is friendlier to my aged eyes, and I have had this particular Winchester longer than this particular Marlin. Some really were and went on to achieve success and longevity, but most proved to be little more than minor variations of existing designs. 4x Pecar Berlin scope with post and cross-hair mounted in Weaver rings. 1. Bolt rotation, i.e. The 9422 is supposed to be an understudy of the centerfire 94, the classic “thutty-thutty.” In exterior appearance and weight, balance, etc., it is very close and owes much to its father. By Tom Boyle. Both brands are aesthetically pleasing----and the Marlin change was, I think, to the good, as the squared lever on my 1982 seems larger and more “old-timey” than on a ‘60sversion I once owned. The Henry’s best group was just under an inch. Join now to ask and comment! None of my triggers have been worked on, and maybe considered a bit heavy by an experienced target shooter. I own couple of versions of each, so what follows is a composite. The 9422 was offered in both .22 Long Rifle and .22 Magnum (WMR) and, if memory serves, retailed initially at $99.95. Marlin’s offering (not currently cataloged,) has been usually dubbed the “Mountie,” whether it was a “Golden 39AMountie,” or, as later versions (and mine) were called, the “Golden 39MMountie.” Same gun, different appointments. It’s a subjective thing, of course, but I can almost reflexively think of five outstanding models that are well worth seeking on the used gun market. The Nylon 66’s unique construction and looks were far ahead of its time. I usually remove the Winchester’s, too, but would feel more comfortable shooting it with the sight hood on than the Marlin’s. A picture of him sitting atop a mountain of the wood blocks was used in an ad promoting the Nylon 66. The 9422 is as smooth as a Henry and of much better quality. Military contracts were drying up at the time, and the company had to find work to comply with that nation’s cradle-to-grave employment policies. Plastic Winchester buttplate. It is definitely not to be used to determine if there is a shell in the chamber. Marlin’s buttstock screws into the tang of the action in the older, time-tried fashion of almost all traditional lever actions. Both have been deadly accurate and silky smooth. Although I do not like its original open sights as much as the Winchester’s, it is already tapped for a receiver peep sight, at least older versions. The Marlin, however, may carry a little bit easier with its slimmer receiver which you can really wrap your hand around. Dry firing is a no-no on the Marlins, and I had to replace broken firing pin in my 1971 Octagon for this reason. Bluing seems to be deeper than the Marlin’s, and the gun just seems to be more nicely finished all around. If reduced to one lever action rimfire for all purposes, I would probably go with the Marlin. The real abomination that was Winchester’s crossbolt safety on its centerfire 94s fortunately never made it over to the rimfire line. 9422 serial number F72158 and 9422M serial number F72159. The trigger guard was stamped sheet steel, as was the detachable single-row magazine. The Marlin has a heftier feel to it, and seems amore shooter-friendly platform with the scope. My first Marlin was a 1960s Mountie, so my sentiments definitely lean that way. The takedown does make possible cleaning the barrel from the breech, however, which is always preferred. As a platform for many and any sight configurations, the Marlin is a good choice to make, at least until they stopped drilling and tapping for receiver sights. This radical-looking yet handsome rifle has long since achieved iconic status. The Winchester carries and feels similar to its big brother, the 94 (as it no doubt was meant to do!) Which brings us to the heart of both rifles----the action. The Marlin’s ejector is a simple part, which must be held down in place by a screw on the left side of the receiver before the barrel can be cleaned from the breech, as it should. Guests. Confused? Winchester did a nicer job on its rear sight than the Marlin, I think, virtually duplicating the standard rear semi-buckhorn sight found on its centerfire 94. Its mother, however, is the old slim, trim Model 61 pump action, with much of the action innards borrowed from this classic and reliable gun. The same year the gun was introduced, Remington field rep Tom Frye set a record for both endurance and marksmanship that has yet to be broken. I have one “XTR” that seems almost red, another with nicely figured, browner walnut finish. Their centerfire 94 has been drilled & tapped for receiver sights since the early ‘50s---why not their 9422? It also had a buttplate screw hole that was missing any threading---the screw was just sitting there, ready to fall out! mag., grooved forged steel receiver, walnut stock and … This does not include me; I knew which .22 Magnum I wanted. It has proven versatile in all lighting conditions with its Lyman peep and Williams “Fire” sight. If ever there was a plain Jane looking rifle, this was it. These  hunting guns are no longer made, but are well worth seeking on the used gun market. To the best of my knowledge the earlier 20 inch barrel rifles had no checkering ,while later 20 inch barrel rifles had checkering.My early Model 9422 20 inch barrel rifle has no checkering. Still… Magazine tubes on both guns are steel, with the inner tube on the Winchester’s starting out as steel, and switching to brass in later versions. Today’s model is a true takedown system, one having only to cock the hammer and unscrew the large thumbscrew on the right side of the receiver and then “break” the action into two parts. It’s fatter forearm and (slightly) heftier buttstock give it more of a “big-gun” feel, and this is ironic, since the Winchester is supposed to be a near-duplicate of a centerfire rifle. Not confined to the “one gun” scenario, I have chosen to have six----so far. . Center: Remington Nylon 66. My earlier, steel-tubed 70s models certainly reflect this. Photo: Top: Winchester Model 9422. So am I----many times. The bolt stays in the left side of the receiver unless removed, so the rifle can actually be stored this way in a case, such as provided for a few years in the late 80s and early 90s in the “TDS” version with a 16 1/2”“Trapper” edition. unfluted. No machining or grinding of facets was done to give relief or visual interest; it was a pipe, plain and simple. Unfortunately, all guns have a limited lifespan in what can be a fickle marketplace, and often their success or failure has nothing to do with their merits. “Traditional” lever action .22rifles, to my mind, is an exclusive category comprising only two rifles----the Marlin 39 in its several variations, and the Winchester 9422. With specific comparisons out of the way, let’s proceed to general impressions one gets from carrying and shooting each. Winchester’s 9422, introduced in the early 70s, duplicated the style of the Marlin at the same time it varied from it and challenged it. Of course, Winchester cannot retail a 9422 even close to the Henry price. Already having a Marlin .22, I wanted a .22 Magnum, and Marlin’s offering was really a rimfire adaptation of the centerfire 1894 action, not a 39.